Since winning American Idol in 2002, Kelly Clarkson has been no stranger to mixing up her look - from blond to brunette, from sweet to sexy, from long to short - but People magazine still couldn't help noticing the dramatic difference between her most recent red carpet look and her off-duty style.
At the CMT Giants event in late October, Kelly sported a perfectly curled coif and polished makeup. But this week, she visited the Broadway musical Avenue Q with no visible makeup and a newly cropped, darker do.
Which look do you prefer, fans?
Share
8 Comments
May 18th, 2007 10:55 AM
All Natural Kelly rocks. (H)
June 6th, 2007 8:49 AM
She looks lovely in both, I'm a fan of make up and yes it does improve your image. But it also hides the real you.
July 10th, 2007 2:34 PM
Both
February 15th, 2008 11:02 PM
I obviously like the make up one better, because it is classy, but I still like the fact that Kelly doesn't wear make up all the time! She ROCKS! and man can she sing!!!
March 10th, 2009 6:27 PM
Kelly is an amazing singer, I wouldn't care what she looks like. Personally, the make-up one is more flattering, but I like when celebs don't wear makeup, it makes them seem more human. GO KELLY!
March 10th, 2009 6:28 PM
Kelly is an amazing singer, I wouldn't care what she looks like. Personally, the make-up one is more flattering, but I like when celebs don't wear makeup, it makes them seem more human. GO KELLY!
March 11th, 2009 10:31 PM
the "glam: shot is SUPER photoshopped. her neck doesn't even look like it's hers and under her eyes is from her forehead, it looks like an amateur who watched a youtube video did (no offense) seriously though. don't expect someone to look like that in real life. yeah, she doesn't look so great in her "off duty" look, but I honestly don't think she cares.
March 13th, 2009 1:27 PM
Both are great!